Esprit des lieux et modèles culturels. La mutation des espaces domestiques en arctique inuit//Sense of Place and Cultural Identities: Inuit Domestic Spaces in transition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the late 50's and early 60% the Inuit people of Canada settled down in permanent villages under various pressures. One of the major changes related to this move to the settled way of life was the shift from igloos — and summer tents — to permanent houses, at first very simple one-room units called "match-box houses" and later multiple-bedroom ones. Houses are a powerful expression of cultural values. Identity is first nurtered inside of them, and one learns there the basic spatial rules of his community. Therefore, one can expect exposure to an architecture carrying values of an alien culture to have important impacts on its dwellers. Yet so far, both geographers and Arctic anthropologists have neglected domestic spaces issues, the former not feeling at ease with the micro-scale and the later focusing their attention on the newly formed communities, at the settlement scale. This paper discusses the results of a study conducted among the Inuinnait people (Western Central Arctic) about the way they have been dealing, for over 30 years now, with the shift from vernacular dwellings to social housing ones. Information was collected through both observation over nearly 15 years (1986-2000) of Inuit's modem homes and their spatial organization, and formal semi-directive interviews conducted with elderly women — who experienced the shift as mothers — in the spring of 1998. The research revealed that adaptation has been more than difficult, but also that, if the Inuit culture is put at risk in the new dwellings, it is inside of them too that the Inuit are creating mediations between their culture in transition and the Western one. Building from this case study, the conclusion insists on the importance of domestic spaces as geographical spaces through which we can get a better understanding of the dynamics of cultures and identifies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".