Identifying the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images using an apex-seeking technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to extract quantitative information from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images (DCE-MRI) it is usually necessary to identify an arterial input function. This is not a trivial problem if there are no major vessels present in the field of view. Most existing techniques rely on operator intervention or use various curve parameters to identify suitable pixels but these are often specific to the anatomical region or the acquisition method used. They also require the signal from several pixels to be averaged in order to improve the signal to noise ratio, however this introduces errors due to partial volume effects. We have described previously how factor analysis can be used to automatically separate arterial and venous components from DCE-MRI studies of the brain but although that method works well for single slice images through the brain when the blood brain barrier technique is intact, it runs into problems for multi-slice images with more complex dynamics. This paper will describe a factor analysis method that is more robust in such situations and is relatively insensitive to the number of physiological components present in the data set. The technique is very similar to that used to identify spectral end-members from multispectral remote sensing images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".