Broadband coplanar waveguide‐fed printed monopole antenna with strip‐sleeves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, the design of a new broadband printed antenna for wireless applications is presented. The proposed antenna structure consists of a planar monopole fed by a coplanar waveguide (CPW) and four strip sleeves. With the integration of these parasitic elements, a wide bandwidth response is achieved. The antenna is designed at the operating frequency of 2.8 GHz, and a parametric study is also performed in order to optimize its operating bandwidth. To validate the design, an antenna prototype is fabricated and tested, and good agreement between the simulated and measured results is obtained. The experimental results show a bandwidth of 49.3%. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 48: 209–212, 2006; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.21307
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".