MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979215482 · doi:10.1002/mop.21307

Broadband coplanar waveguide‐fed printed monopole antenna with strip‐sleeves

2005· article· en· W1979215482 on OpenAlexaff
Yacouba Coulibaly, Tayeb A. Denidni, Larbi Talbi

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du QuébecUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoplanar waveguideMonopole antennaBroadbandMicrowaveBandwidth (computing)EngineeringElectrical engineeringPlanarDipole antennaCoaxial antennaElectronic engineeringAntenna (radio)OptoelectronicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, the design of a new broadband printed antenna for wireless applications is presented. The proposed antenna structure consists of a planar monopole fed by a coplanar waveguide (CPW) and four strip sleeves. With the integration of these parasitic elements, a wide bandwidth response is achieved. The antenna is designed at the operating frequency of 2.8 GHz, and a parametric study is also performed in order to optimize its operating bandwidth. To validate the design, an antenna prototype is fabricated and tested, and good agreement between the simulated and measured results is obtained. The experimental results show a bandwidth of 49.3%. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 48: 209–212, 2006; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.21307

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207