MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Storage conditions of avulsed teeth affect the phenotype of cultured human periodontal ligament cells

2000· article· en· W1979220883 on OpenAlexafffund
Derrick Lin, Danelle Kenny, Edward J. Barrett, P. Lekic, C McCulloch

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Periodontal Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDental Trauma and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersMedical Research Council CanadaHospital for Sick ChildrenMinistry of Education, IndiaMinistry of Earth Sciences
KeywordsPeriodontal fiberDentistryPhenotypeAffect (linguistics)MedicineBiologyGeneticsPsychologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After severe injury to the periodontal ligament (PL), the phenotypes of cells recolonizing root surfaces influence the extent and type of repair processes. In teeth that are replanted following avulsion injury, recolonization of the PL space by osteogenic cells instead of by PL fibroblasts may favor bone formation (i.e. ankylosis) instead of PL regeneration. We consider here that recolonization processes depend in part on the storage conditions of the teeth following avulsion. We used an in vitro cell culture model to assess the effect of storage conditions on immunohistochemical staining of several marker proteins that are expressed by osteogenic cells (osteopontin and alkaline phosphatase) and fibroblasts (alpha-smooth muscle actin, type III and XII collagens). Prior to cell culture, extracted human premolar teeth were stored in air ("dry") or in alpha-MEM ("wet") for either 30 or 120 min as surrogate conditions for the variations of extra-alveolar tooth storage that may occur following avulsion. Collagenase/trypsin-digested suspensions of PL cells were prepared from the tissue adherent to the extracted root surface. Passage #2 or #3 cultures were immunostained and examined by fluorescence microscopy. For type XII collagen, cells from wet samples displayed perinuclear staining while cells from 30-min dry samples showed only isolated foci. The staining for 120-min dry samples was weak and non-specific. alpha-Smooth muscle actin was not incorporated into stress fibers in wet samples, whereas dry samples demonstrated prominent stress fibers stained for alpha-smooth muscle actin. Detached cytoplasmic fragments resembling cell processes that stained for alpha-smooth muscle actin were abundant in dry samples, indicating the presence of highly contractile cells. The staining for osteopontin was mainly perinuclear but was more intense in dry samples. The focal adhesion pattern of osteopontin staining in 120-min dry samples resembled that of migrating osteogenic cells. The pattern of staining did not vary for type III collagen or alkaline phosphatase, although staining for alkaline phosphatase was more intense in samples stored under dry conditions. We conclude that prolonged extra-alveolar dry storage favors increased in vitro growth of contractile cells expressing osteogenic cell markers while storage in cell culture medium favors growth of cells with the classical phenotype of PL fibroblasts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.528
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Periodontal ResearchSame topicDental Trauma and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207