MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979225965 · doi:10.2495/rbm130231

Bank erosion and planimetric evolution of alluvial meandering streams

2013· article· en· W1979225965 on OpenAlexafffund
A. M. Ferreira da Silva, Mohsen Ebrahimi

Bibliographic record

VenueWIT transactions on ecology and the environment · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersTechnische Universität MünchenNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQueen's University
KeywordsErosionBank erosionAlluviumGeologySTREAMSHydrology (agriculture)BankGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an attempt is made to explain why, in the absence of geological constraints, some rivers remain regular, in which case they tend to closely follow sine-generated curves, while others become irregular. The considerations rest on the present understanding of physical mechanisms determining both meandering bed deformation and bank erosion, as well as laboratory experiments carried out at Queen's University. The experimental observations suggest that the degree of erodibility of the bank plays an essential role in determining the "planimetric fate" of the stream.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWIT transactions on ecology and the environmentSame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207