Fractures Following Radiotherapy and Limb-Salvage Surgery for Lower Extremity Soft-Tissue Sarcomas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present retrospective study was to determine the correlation between radiation therapy and the risk of postradiation fracture following combined therapy for the treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas of the lower extremity. METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-four patients with lower extremity sarcomas that had been treated with combined external beam radiation therapy and limb-salvage surgery were evaluated on the basis of a combined chart and data-base review. For the purposes of analysis, high-dose radiation was defined as 60 or 66 Gy and low-dose radiation was defined as 50 Gy. The timing of irradiation was defined as preoperative, postoperative, or preoperative followed by a postoperative boost. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine which factors were associated with fracture risk. RESULTS: Twenty-seven fractures occurred in twenty-three patients. Twenty-four fractures occurred in twenty patients who had been managed with high-dose radiation. Seventeen of these patients had received postoperative radiation (with fifteen patients receiving 66 Gy and two receiving 60 Gy), and three had received preoperative radiation with a postoperative boost (total dose, 66 Gy). Three fractures occurred in three patients who had received preoperative, low-dose radiation (50 Gy). Of the twenty-three patients who sustained a pathologic fracture, eighteen were female and five were male. The crude median time to fracture was forty-three months. Most fractures occurred in the femoral shaft (thirteen) or the femoral neck (eight). High-dose radiation was associated with a greater risk of fracture when compared with low-dose radiation (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Women more than fifty-five years of age who are managed with removal of a thigh sarcoma combined with radiation therapy have a higher risk of pathologic fracture. The frequency of pathologic fractures associated with higher doses (60 or 66 Gy) of radiation is significantly higher than that associated with lower doses (50 Gy).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".