Optimal joint power-rate adaptation for error resilient video coding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years digital imaging devices become an integral part of our daily lives due to the advancements in imaging, storage and wireless communication technologies. Power-Rate-Distortion efficiency is the key factor common to all resource constrained portable devices. In addition, especially in real-time wireless multimedia applications, channel adaptive and error resilient source coding techniques should be considered in conjunction with the P-R-D efficiency, since most of the time Automatic Repeat-reQuest (ARQ) and Forward Error Correction (FEC) are either not feasible or costly in terms of bandwidth efficiency delay. In this work, we focus on the scenarios of real-time video communication for resource constrained devices over bandwidth limited and lossy channels, and propose an analytic Power-channel Error-Rate-Distortion (P-E-R-D) model. In particular, probabilities of macroblocks coding modes are intelligently controlled through an optimization process according to their distinct rate-distortion-complexity performance for a given channel error rate. The framework provides theoretical guidelines for the joint analysis of error resilient source coding and resource allocation. Experimental results show that our optimal framework provides consistent rate-distortion performance gain under different power constraints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".