MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979240427 · doi:10.2523/iptc-16499-ms

Research and Application of Fire-Flooding Technologies in Post-Steam Injected Heavy Oil Reservoir

2013· article· en· W1979240427 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringSteam injectionEnvironmental scienceFlooding (psychology)CombustionWater injection (oil production)Ignition systemPetroleumWaste managementEnvironmental engineeringGeologyEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As fire-flooding has strong adaptability to develop the reservoir, it can be considered as a follow-up EOR technology of the low economic profit and high oil recovery reservoirs flooded by water or steam. Because of the complicated secondary water and steam channels, fire-flooding in post-steam-injected reservoir is far different from that in original reservoir. In this paper, the mechanism and problems associated with development engineering of fire-flooding in post-steam-injected heavy oil reservoir was studied systematically by using1D&3D physical simulation systems and reservoir numerical simulator. The temperature of combustion zone decreased and high-temperature zone enlarged because there existed secondary water formed during steam injection which could absorb and carry heat towards producers out of combustion front during fire flooding, but high saturation of water in layer caused by secondary water had less influence on the quantity of fuel deposit and air consumption. In the process of 3D fire flooding experiments, air override was observed during combustion front moving forward and resulted in a coke zone in the bottom of layer, and the ultimate recovery factor reached 65%~70% on fact that the saturation of oil within the coke zone was no more than 20%. The flooding model, well pattern, well spacing, and air injection rate was optimized according to the specific property and the existed well pattern in post-steam-injected heavy oil reservoir, and the key techniques of ignition, lifting, and anticorrosion was also selected in the same time. The pilot of fire flooding in H1 block in Xinjiang oil field was carried out since Dec. 2009on the base of these research work, and now the pilot begin to show the better performance. The production oil is about 49t/d, and the water cut is stable below 70%, the air oil ratio is about 2000m3/t, the good performance is gained for this kind of abandoned post-steam-injected heavy oil reservoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it