MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A study of the effects of lorazepam and dextromethorphan on the response to cortical 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

2005· article· en· W1979278934 on OpenAlexaff
Paul B. Fitzgerald, Jessica Benitez Mendieta, Jeff Daskalakis, Anthony R. de Castella, Jayashri Kulkarni

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersNational Health and Medical Research Council
KeywordsTranscranial magnetic stimulationDextromethorphanStimulationMotor cortexTranscranial alternating current stimulationLorazepamNeurosciencePsychologyAnesthesiaMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We studied the effects of lorazepam and dextromethorphan on the responses to 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation applied to the left human motor cortex. Lorazepam, dextromethorphan or placebo was administered to 45 normal controls in a double-blind fashion 2.5 h before the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation procedure. Motor cortical excitability was measured with single transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses before and after 15 min of 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation applied at supra-threshold intensity. 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation resulted in a decrease in motor cortical excitability in the placebo group but not in the groups taking lorazepam or dextromethorphan. These results suggest that cortical responses to 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation are dependent on activity at both gamma-aminobutyric acid and N-methyl-D-asparate receptor systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroreportSame topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207