MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979283649 · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.755

Performance Comparison of Zeotropic and Azeotropic Refrigerants in Evaporation Through Inclined Tubes

2014· article· en· W1979283649 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZeotropic mixtureRefrigerantThermodynamicsMaterials scienceEvaporationMechanicsGas compressor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zeotropic and Azeotropic refrigerants are the feasible replacements to HCFC due to ecological tribulations; and the production of most widely used HCFC-22 has been banned by the Montreal Protocol and UNFCCC Regulation. This paper presents an experimental study on heat transfer characteristics in evaporation of zeotropic mixture R407C and quasi-azeotropic blend R410A through small diameter (ID 7.0 mm) smooth tube inclined at seven different angles from 00 to 900. Experimental data were acquired over an imposed heat flux range of 5-10 kW/m2 and the refrigerant mass velocity was varied from 80 to 300 kg/m2s at an evaporating temperature range of -50C to +80C. The investigation verified that the heat transfer characteristic of R410A was better than R407C at all inclinations of the tube.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it