MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1979306213 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2013.6723736

Continuous sea ice thickness estimation using a joint MODIS and AMSR-E guided variational model

2013· article· en· W1979306213 on OpenAlexaff
A. Wong, K. Andrea Scott, E. Li, Robert Amelard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea ice concentrationModerate-resolution imaging spectroradiometerRemote sensingSea iceEnvironmental scienceSea surface temperatureMeteorologySea ice thicknessJoint (building)Cloud computingCloud coverClimatologyGeologyArctic ice packSatelliteComputer scienceGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estimates of sea ice thickness are important for shipping and weather forecasting applications. Sea ice thickness can be estimated using data from the thermal channels on the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). However, using this data for studies of surface conditions is significantly hampered by cloud cover. This is particularly problematic for studies of the marginal ice zone, where atmospheric conditions often lead to persistent cloudy conditions. In this study a new method is proposed in which data from a passive microwave sensor is used to guide the estimation of surface temperature in cloud-covered regions. The impact of the method is verified by checking sea ice thickness values calculated using the guided surface temperature against values from operational sea ice charts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→