MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979319784 · doi:10.4000/rccsar.239

The Janus Model of Legal Regulation: Changes in the Political Status of Justice

2010· article· en· W1979319784 on OpenAlexaff
Jacques Commaille

Bibliographic record

VenueRCCS Annual Review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJudicial and Constitutional Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsDemocratizationRationalization (economics)Economic JusticePolitical scienceLawLaw and economicsSociologyDemocracy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on a social science perspective that gives priority to the political dimension of law and justice, this paper analyses three orientations of justice: as part of a rationalization process; as part of a democratization movement; and as part of a process of neoliberalization. From the analysis of these three types of legal regulation, two distinct forms of legal and judicial status may be identified in relation to the political: in the first, the legal-judicial is a central element in political regulation, while in the second it is instrumentalized by the political. The conclusion suggests that the existence of this Janus model of legal-judicial regulation points to a crisis in the political sphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRCCS Annual ReviewSame topicJudicial and Constitutional StudiesFrench-language works237,207