Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article aborde la question de l'approche éthique de la littérature dans le cadre d'une remise en question de l'hégémonie exercée sur les champs philosophique et littéraire par la tradition platonico-aristotélicienne, en évoquant l'évolution du système des Appareils Idéologiques d'État qui gouverne le champ du littéraire et en distinguant les trois pratiques sociales qui constituent l'activité institutionnelle (écrire, lire, critiquer). Dans une deuxième partie, il vise à montrer comment cette approche implique que soient posés le problème du sujet ainsi que celui des rapports du signifié au sens que tisse le texte. Ceci amène Edmond Cros à rappeler les présupposés sur la base desquels il construit son discours critique au centre duquel il situe le concept de morphogénèse, défini par le fonctionnement spécifique d'un champ notionnel où s'affrontent des valeurs sociales et morales redistribuées par des discours contradictoires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".