MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979339958 · doi:10.1115/imece2013-63312

Measurements of Car Vibrations Under Real-Life Driving Conditions and Assessment of Energy Harvesting for Wireless Sensor Nodes

2013· article· en· W1979339958 on OpenAlexaff
Andre Dompierre, Mohamed Seydou Traore, Luc G. Fréchette

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChassisVibrationAutomotive industryEnergy harvestingAutomotive engineeringWireless sensor networkEnergy (signal processing)WirelessPower (physics)Range (aeronautics)BrakeWork (physics)AcousticsEngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a study of car vibrations measured under typical driving conditions to assess the potential of powering automotive sensors incorporated in cars via vibration energy harvesting (VEH). The locations where sensors or switches are currently used and the requirements of potential automotive wireless sensor nodes were used as criteria to narrow down the location of the measurements. A total of 20 locations were retained after keeping the sensors with lower requirements. Random vibrations due to the road perturbations as well as part of the structural responses of the vehicle from changing vehicle speed were observed through vibration peaks which shift in frequency and others which are steady despite the changing conditions. The spectral analyses indicate that most of the available vibration energy is in a frequency range below 200 Hz, with harvestable consistent peaks below 140 Hz on the front chassis, the rear and front plastic bumpers and the brake fluid tank. An analytical model is used to assess the power output from several linear harvester MEMS designs and we estimate that continuous power over 100 nW are achievable from those sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207