The Impact of Clinically Diagnosed Personality Disorders on Acute and One-Year Outcomes of Electroconvulsive Therapy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical experience suggests that patients with depression and a comorbid personality disorder (PD) may have a poorer response to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Only a few published studies have examined the relationship between comorbid personality disorders and response of major depression to ECT. These studies have used relatively small numbers of patients. The present study is a retrospective review of 107 inpatients with a major depressive episode referred for ECT. Patients with a clinically diagnosed PD, especially a cluster B PD, had a significantly poorer acute response to ECT than those without a PD. During the first year after treatment, ECT responders with a comorbid PD had a higher rate of relapse of depression. The retrospective study design limits the strength of conclusions that can be drawn. Nevertheless, it appears that clinically diagnosed PDs may be predictive of poor outcome in patients receiving ECT for depression. Further prospective study of the relationship between both clinically diagnosed PDs and structured interview based PD diagnoses and ECT treatment response is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it