MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979358613 · doi:10.3138/carto.49.1.1798

Understanding William Petty's Atlas of Ireland

2014· article· en· W1979358613 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Iván Ochsenius Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueCartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtlas (anatomy)PoliticsReciprocalWorld mapCartographyNorthern irelandHistoryGenealogyGeographyPolitical scienceLawEthnologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An understanding of early maps is best achieved through an analysis that seeks to integrate a scientific approach to map history with the idea that maps are also subject to socio-economic and political influences prevailing at the time. An analytical framework that uses such an integrated approach is applied here to William Petty's atlas of Ireland, published in 1685 under the title Hiberniae Delineatio, in an effort to deepen our understanding of this landmark in the mapping of Ireland. The atlas emerges as an incomplete and sometimes flawed document which, nevertheless, made Ireland the first country in Europe to be mapped from accurately measured surveys and provided the definitive shape of Ireland for the next century. It also gives testimony to the reciprocal relationships between maps and society and illustrates the role of the map itself in the historical process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and GeovisualizationSame topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207