MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979361119 · doi:10.1080/08893670500071959

<i>Beast of Burden</i>(<i>Chekku Madu</i>): The Power of the Wandering Poet Among the Sri Lankan Tamil Diaspora

2005· article· en· W1979361119 on OpenAlexaff
Robin Oakley, V. I. S. Jayapalan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Poetry Therapy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiaspora, migration, transnational identity
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTamilDiasporaPeasantPower (physics)EthosHomelandSociologyGender studiesHistoryPoliticsLiteraturePolitical scienceArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The short story Beast of Burden illustrates a common experience faced by educated, qualified, and &ldquo;visible&rdquo; and migrants of peasant class to &ldquo;developed&rdquo; countries. Containing a remarkable account of the birth of the individual and the contradictions generated through the process of segmentation from the collective, the story illustrates the results on the individual of a clash of cultural values under the capitalist ethos. Significant to medical anthropology, moreover, are the healing properties the story holds among the Sri Lankan Tamil Diaspora, who, well educated and trained for white collar work, invariably spend an extended period working in the unskilled service sector. Many of these individuals have, moreover, experienced some form of depression, or have friends of family affected by the stigmatised bio-medical label of &ldquo;mental illness&rdquo;. The story, its teller and its audience underscores the power of a culture of literacy and the lasting significance of the wandering poet in communal healing from trauma that is not only relevant to Tamils, but to many new immigrants who have fled from trauma and war.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.014
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Poetry TherapySame topicDiaspora, migration, transnational identityFrench-language works237,207