Possibility of channel flow in the southern Canadian Cordillera: a new approach to explain existing data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Existing structural, metamorphic and geochronological data in and close to the Shuswap Metamorphic Complex in the southern Canadian Cordillera are shown to be consistent with a channel flow model. Four general structural levels (domains) can be distinguished in the region, based on the orientation and vergence of folds. In the lowest three levels folds are mostly recumbent, whereas in the uppermost level they are upright. The lowest three levels are interpreted as a channel flow zone. NE-verging folds of the lowest level (Domain 1, e.g. the Monashee Complex) formed during top-to-the-NE detachment flow and/or in the lower part of a channel flow zone. When detachment flow changed to channel flow, the sense of shear changed in the upper part of the channel flow zone, resulting in overprinting of NE-verging folds by SW-verging folds (Domain 2, e.g. most parts of the Shuswap Metamorphic Complex to the west of the Monashee Complex). Temperature was probably increasing, weakening a progressively larger portion of the crust, and the crustal shear zone therefore widened. Thus, in the highest structural levels within the channel flow zone, SW-verging folds developed in areas where no NE-verging folds originally formed (Domain 3, e.g. the Cariboo Mountains). The channel flow model as presented here is compatible with many of the ductile structures and accommodates existing metamorphic and geochronological data in the part of the southern Canadian Cordillera described.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".