MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979378396 · doi:10.1353/swh.2007.0098

The Rocky Mountain Locust in Texas

2007· article· en· W1979378396 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stanley D. Casto

Bibliographic record

VenueSouthwestern historical quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect behavior and control techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocustGrasshopperGeographyMigratory locustSwarming (honey bee)EcologyArchaeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Female locusts depositing eggs. Illustration from "The Rocky Mountain locust, or grasshopper ofthe West," in Report ofthe CommissionerofAgriculturefortheyear i8yy (Washington, D.C: Government Printing Office, 1877), plate 1, figure 1 (after Riley). The Rocky Mountain Locust in Texas By Stanley D. Casto* Listen all who live in the land. Has anything like this ever happened in your day or in the days ofyour forefathers? (Joel 1:2) The first Texans to experience the ravages of the Rocky Mountain locust (Melanoplus spretus) must certainly have recalled the question asked by the prophetJoel during the locust plague in ancient Israel. Has anything like this ever happened in your day or in the days of your forefathers ? From where did this pestiferous insect come? Could its sudden appearance in such enormous numbers be rationally explained or was it sent, as suggested byJoel, as a reminder that the day of the Lord was near? And of immediate concern, how might the gardens, orchards, and crops be protected from this insatiable destroyer of plant life? These questions would eventually be answered but not before the citizens of Texas had endured a number of devastating visitations. The Rocky Mountain locust was a migratory grasshopper, now presumed extinct, that lived in the valleys ofthe Rocky Mountains ofthe western United States and southern Canada. Large swarms periodically left the place of their nativity and migrated onto the Great Plains of the United States and southern Canada. Although swarming and migration undoubtedly occurred for hundreds ofyears, it was not until the early 1 800s that these phenomena were first noted in the historical literature. The magnitude of the swarms and the damage they caused peaked during the 1 870s. The migrations then diminished over the next two decades, and by the turn of the century had * StanleyD. Casto is currentlyWells Research Professor, Department ofBiology, University ofMary Hardin-Baylor, Belton,Texas. He was formerly professorand chairman ofdie department ofbiology at the University ofMary Hardin-Baylor and retired from full-tíme teaching in 2000. He would like to thank Prof. Horace Burke for his willingness to share his knowledge ofthe history ofentomology in Texas, as well as for his encouragement, guidance, and editorial suggestions. Appreciation is also extended toJeffrey Lockwood for his review and helpful comments on an early draft of diis paper. The newspapers cited herein are found in the collections at the Center forAmerican History at the University ofTexas at Austin, the Texas State Archives, and the Texas State Library. This study was supported by a grant from the University of Mary Hardin-Baylor. Vol. CXI, No. 2 Southwestern Historical Quarterly October, 2007 1 84Southwestern Historical QuarterlyOctober ceased. So catastrophic was the damage during the 1 870s that the federal governmentcreated aspecial entomological commission to study the pest and devise methods for its control. The damage caused by the Rocky Mountain locust in Texas was less severe than that which occurred in regions farther north.1 Thesudden and unpredictable occurrence ofthe locustswas, however, asource ofapprehension and the subject ofspeculation in die news media of the time. Scientific expertise and governmental assistance were nonexistent, and farmers were forced to devise their own strategies for dealing with the pest. This paper chronicles the invasions of the Rocky Mountain locust, its effect on agriculture, and the struggles ofTexans compelled to deal with this once serious but now apparently extinct insect pest. The swarms of locusts that invaded Texas usually arrived from the north duringOctober orearlyNovember, and overthe nextseveral weeks deposited enormous numbers ofeggs in the soil before dying. Eggs laid in the fall hatched fromJanuary through March ofthe followingyear. The winglessjuvenileswere at first sedentary but later congregated into massive schools or armies that migrated over the countryside destroying all vegetation in their path. When mature and able to fly, the locusts gathered into large swarms and departed, usually flying in a northwesterly direction as they passed overhead. The first visitation of the Rocky Mountain locust to Texas is believed to have occurred in 1845. This conclusion is based on the sources consulted during the early 1870s by C. V. Riley while he was serving as the state entomologist ofMissouri.2 Riley's informants were presumably eyewitnesses to the events of 1845...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouthwestern historical quarterlySame topicInsect behavior and control techniquesFrench-language works237,207