MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1979378396 · doi:10.1353/swh.2007.0098

The Rocky Mountain Locust in Texas

2007· article· en· W1979378396 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueSouthwestern historical quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueInsect behavior and control techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLocustGrasshopperGeographyMigratory locustSwarming (honey bee)EcologyArchaeologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Female locusts depositing eggs. Illustration from "The Rocky Mountain locust, or grasshopper ofthe West," in Report ofthe CommissionerofAgriculturefortheyear i8yy (Washington, D.C: Government Printing Office, 1877), plate 1, figure 1 (after Riley). The Rocky Mountain Locust in Texas By Stanley D. Casto* Listen all who live in the land. Has anything like this ever happened in your day or in the days ofyour forefathers? (Joel 1:2) The first Texans to experience the ravages of the Rocky Mountain locust (Melanoplus spretus) must certainly have recalled the question asked by the prophetJoel during the locust plague in ancient Israel. Has anything like this ever happened in your day or in the days of your forefathers ? From where did this pestiferous insect come? Could its sudden appearance in such enormous numbers be rationally explained or was it sent, as suggested byJoel, as a reminder that the day of the Lord was near? And of immediate concern, how might the gardens, orchards, and crops be protected from this insatiable destroyer of plant life? These questions would eventually be answered but not before the citizens of Texas had endured a number of devastating visitations. The Rocky Mountain locust was a migratory grasshopper, now presumed extinct, that lived in the valleys ofthe Rocky Mountains ofthe western United States and southern Canada. Large swarms periodically left the place of their nativity and migrated onto the Great Plains of the United States and southern Canada. Although swarming and migration undoubtedly occurred for hundreds ofyears, it was not until the early 1 800s that these phenomena were first noted in the historical literature. The magnitude of the swarms and the damage they caused peaked during the 1 870s. The migrations then diminished over the next two decades, and by the turn of the century had * StanleyD. Casto is currentlyWells Research Professor, Department ofBiology, University ofMary Hardin-Baylor, Belton,Texas. He was formerly professorand chairman ofdie department ofbiology at the University ofMary Hardin-Baylor and retired from full-tíme teaching in 2000. He would like to thank Prof. Horace Burke for his willingness to share his knowledge ofthe history ofentomology in Texas, as well as for his encouragement, guidance, and editorial suggestions. Appreciation is also extended toJeffrey Lockwood for his review and helpful comments on an early draft of diis paper. The newspapers cited herein are found in the collections at the Center forAmerican History at the University ofTexas at Austin, the Texas State Archives, and the Texas State Library. This study was supported by a grant from the University of Mary Hardin-Baylor. Vol. CXI, No. 2 Southwestern Historical Quarterly October, 2007 1 84Southwestern Historical QuarterlyOctober ceased. So catastrophic was the damage during the 1 870s that the federal governmentcreated aspecial entomological commission to study the pest and devise methods for its control. The damage caused by the Rocky Mountain locust in Texas was less severe than that which occurred in regions farther north.1 Thesudden and unpredictable occurrence ofthe locustswas, however, asource ofapprehension and the subject ofspeculation in die news media of the time. Scientific expertise and governmental assistance were nonexistent, and farmers were forced to devise their own strategies for dealing with the pest. This paper chronicles the invasions of the Rocky Mountain locust, its effect on agriculture, and the struggles ofTexans compelled to deal with this once serious but now apparently extinct insect pest. The swarms of locusts that invaded Texas usually arrived from the north duringOctober orearlyNovember, and overthe nextseveral weeks deposited enormous numbers ofeggs in the soil before dying. Eggs laid in the fall hatched fromJanuary through March ofthe followingyear. The winglessjuvenileswere at first sedentary but later congregated into massive schools or armies that migrated over the countryside destroying all vegetation in their path. When mature and able to fly, the locusts gathered into large swarms and departed, usually flying in a northwesterly direction as they passed overhead. The first visitation of the Rocky Mountain locust to Texas is believed to have occurred in 1845. This conclusion is based on the sources consulted during the early 1870s by C. V. Riley while he was serving as the state entomologist ofMissouri.2 Riley's informants were presumably eyewitnesses to the events of 1845...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,753
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,989

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle