MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979390232 · doi:10.1097/mbc.0b013e328323da86

Pharmacokinetic and clinical data supporting the use of fondaparinux 1.5 mg once daily in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in renally impaired patients

2009· article· en· W1979390232 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health Sciences
FundersSanofi
KeywordsFondaparinuxMedicineRenal functionPlaceboPharmacokineticsAnesthesiaRegimenPopulationUrologyInternal medicineVenous thromboembolismThrombosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study aim was to determine the value of fondaparinux at the once-daily 1.5 mg dose in patients with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance between 20 and 50 ml/min). Pharmacokinetic simulations were performed using a population pharmacokinetic model based on data obtained in 756 patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. The efficacy (venous thromboembolism) and safety (major bleeding) of 1.5 mg fondaparinux were determined by analyzing the available data obtained in all thromboprophylaxis trials using this dosage. The predicted steady-state exposure [area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24)] to fondaparinux between patients with moderate renal impairment receiving 1.5 mg and patients with normal renal function receiving 2.5 mg was similar. In four phase II trials (two trials versus placebo, one versus enoxaparin and one without comparator), 353 patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement (10.8% with moderate renal impairment) received fondaparinux 1.5 mg. The overall rate of venous thromboembolism and major bleeding was 10.4 and 0.3%. Fondaparinux 1.5 mg was significantly more effective than placebo (P < 0.01) and was as effective as, and tended to be safer (P = 0.05) than, twice-daily 30 mg enoxaparin. The effect was maintained in patients with moderate renal impairment. The once-daily administration of 1.5 mg fondaparinux in patients with moderate renal impairment resulted in a predicted exposure to the drug similar to that achieved with 2.5 mg in patients with normal renal function. This dosage regimen showed a favorable efficacy/safety clinical profile and should be appropriate in preventing venous thromboembolism in patients with moderate renal impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it