Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ L'anthropologie au risque des religions mondiales Les entreprises religieuses transnationales qui investissent l'Afrique d'aujourd'hui substituent à la tradition orale des mythes la lettre de la Bible, au pragmatisme des rites une liturgie de la prière, aux secrets de l'initiation les témoignages de conversion, à l'éradication des sorciers la diabolisation des génies païens. L'ethnographe doit suivre des fidèles évoluant sur de multiples scènes, conjuguant l'ancrage communautaire local et les ressources d'un réseau international. Comment appréhender à la fois les campagnes d'évangélisation, les pèlerinages suscités par le prosélytisme missionnaire et la multiplication de petites églises ouvertes au bricolage liturgique et à la théologie narrative des témoignages ? Le temps est venu où les ethnologues, vieux habitués des missions et complices des grands initiés, entrent dans les églises et affrontent les risques d'une immersion dans le milieu des convertis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".