MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P64The newly calculated equations of nuchal skinfold thickness measurement in mid‐trimester

2000· article· en· W1979425322 on OpenAlexfundno aff
H. S. Won, M. K. Kim, P. R. Lee, I. S. Lee, A. Kim, JH Nam

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity Health Network
KeywordsMedicineBreech presentationGestational ageUltrasoundVertex (graph theory)Linear regressionFetusGestationRegression analysisCorrelationObstetricsPregnancyStatisticsMathematicsGraphCombinatoricsGeometryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Use of nuchal skinfold thickness (NT) measurement as an ultrasound marker for Down syndrome has been limited due to a high false positive rate. We suggested that some variables, which influence on NT have been presented. The purpose of our study was to identify the variables that have effects on measured values of NT, and to make a regression equation based on those variables. Method The data on gestational age (GA), cephalic index (CI), presentation (Pr; vertex or breech) and the presence or absence of nuchal cord (NC) were collected prospectively on 548 normal singleton fetuses between 16 and 24 weeks' gestation. We calculated independent correlation of those variables with NT by multiple regression analysis and made a regression equation based on GA, CI, Pr, and NC. Results GA has positive correlation and CI has negative correlation with NT significantly. The nuchal skinfold was thicker among fetuses with breech presentation rather than those of vertex presentation and increased in the presence of nuchal cord. The all four variables (GA, CI, Pr, and NC) were independent factors to NT by multiple regression analysis. We calculated the expected NT through these observations; for fetuses presenting vertex, NT = 5.608 + 0.243GA − 0.066CI + NC* and for breech, NT = 2.803 + 0.392GA − 0.066CI + NC* (*if no NC, NC* equals −0.785 and zero for the other). Conclusion This is the first report, which takes GA, CI, Pr and NC for correlation factors with NT as a whole. These equations may be considered as a screening method for the detection of aneuploidies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207