Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au-delà de la vérité reçue d'une transformation radicale des pratiques métatextuelles - qui culmine dans la perception généralisée d'une hybridation irréversible du commentaire et de la fiction -, quelle est l'ampleur réelle des mutations formelles de la critique contemporaine ? Le présent article évalue les transferts entre la prose narrative et le métatexte postmodernes en analysant les modalités et stratégies énonciatives de textes critiques et, inversement, les enjeux critiques que s'approprie le récit métafictionnel (dont l'œuvre de Borges se veut le prototype). Tout en articulant une comparaison entre un corpus transnational et les pratiques discursives québécoises, l'étude nous conduit à nous demander si les réaménagements de l'espace métatextuel ne se réduiraient pas essentiellement à des changements d'ordre axiologique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".