Electrodeposition of hyaluronic acid and composite films
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrodeposition method has been developed for the fabrication of hyaluronic acid films from sodium hyaluronate solutions. The amount of the deposited material increased with increasing deposition time, resulting in the formation of 0·1–3 μm thick films. The co-deposition of hyaluronic acid and hydroxyapatite (HA) resulted in the fabrication of novel nanocomposite films by electrodeposition. In the proposed method, hyaluronate provided electrosteric stabilisation and charging of HA particles. Deposit composition can be varied by the variation of HA concentration in the sodium hyaluronate solutions. The method enabled the formation of composite films of different thicknesses in the range of 0·1–100 μm. Obtained films were studied by X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis, scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Composite films showed corrosion protection of stainless steel substrates in Ringer's physiological solutions. The mechanism of deposition is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it