A Misdiagnosed Iliac Pseudoaneurysm Complicated Lumbar Disc Surgery Performed 13 Years Ago
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Case report. OBJECTIVE: To describe a unique case of iliac pseudoaneurysm-complicated lumbar disc surgery performed 13 years ago. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Major vascular injury is an unusual but life-threatening complication of lumbar disc surgery. If a major vascular injury is unnoticed, the late complications, pseudoaneurysm, may be diagnosed years after primary lumbar disc surgery. Pseudoaneurysm can lead to compression of adjacent neurovascular structures; however, erosion into the adjacent vertebras and presentation with symptoms of nerve root irritation are rare. METHODS: The patient was a 54-year-old man who presented with pain and numbness in right hip and leg. Examination was normal. A plain radiograph showed destruction of the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebras. Magnetic resonance image showed a retroperitoneal mass eroding into the adjacent vertebras. The mass was primarily misdiagnosed as a neoplasm and a percutaneous needle biopsy was recommended. Before puncture, the computed tomographic angiogram confirmed it to be a pseudoaneurysm of left common iliac artery. Then, implantation of a covered stent was undergone. RESULTS: After implantation of a covered stent, the symptoms were relieved immediately. At the 12-month follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic, and a computed tomographic angiogram revealed progressive shrinkage of the mass and significant healing of the eroded vertebras. CONCLUSION: As an unusual complication of lumbar disc surgery, iliac pseudoaneurysm can present with radiating pain even after 13 years and erode into the adjacent vertebras producing appearances mimicking a tumor. For mass located anterior to vertebras, the percutaneous biopsy must be cautiously performed, and a contrast-enhanced computed tomographic scan is necessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".