MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979447553 · doi:10.1042/cs20060140

Are the lipid-modifying effects of fibrates mediated by alterations in plasma lipid transfer activity?

2006· letter· en· W1979447553 on OpenAlexaff
Gary F. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Science · 2006
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFenofibrateCholesterylester transfer proteinPhospholipid transfer proteinChemistryLipid metabolismEndocrinologyPhospholipidInternal medicinePlant lipid transfer proteinsCholesteryl esterAgonistPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptorLipoproteinPPAR agonistPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaReceptorBiochemistryCholesterolMedicineNuclear receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fenofibrate, a PPAR-alpha (peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor-alpha) agonist, has been shown to modify plasma lipid and lipoprotein composition and metabolism by a variety of mechanisms. In addition, fenofibrate has been shown to increase the activity of PLTP (phospholipid transfer protein) and to reduce the activity of CETP (cholesteryl ester transfer protein). It is not known, however, whether the changes in PLTP and CETP plasma activity play an active role in the lipid changes observed with fenofibrate therapy, and this is investigated by Watts and co-workers in the present issue of Clinical Science.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0120.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ScienceSame topicPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207