MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979456641 · doi:10.1021/cm8018296

One-Step Synthesis of High-Quality Gradient CdHgTe Nanocrystals: A Prerequisite to Prepare CdHgTe−Polymer Bulk Composites with Intense Near-Infrared Photoluminescence

2008· article· en· W1979456641 on OpenAlexaff
Haizhu Sun, Hao Zhang, Jie Ju, Junhu Zhang, Gang Qian, Chunlei Wang, Bai Yang, Zhi Yuan Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceMaterials scienceThermal stabilityCadmium telluride photovoltaicsNanocrystalPolymerLuminescenceInfraredQuantum yieldNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsChemical engineeringComposite materialOpticsFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have demonstrated an efficient method to prepare high-quality CdHgTe alloyed nanocrystals (NCs) by making use of a large difference in the solubility between CdTe and HgTe in aqueous medium. The resultant NCs show a gradient quasi “core/shell” structure in which the “core” is rich in HgTe and the “shell” is rich in CdTe. This unique structure makes the photoluminescence (PL) quantum yield (QY) of CdHgTe NCs up to 45% and remarkably improves their stability. The excellent stability of CdHgTe NCs allows for the successful preparation of NC-polymer bulk composites with intense PL in the near-infrared spectral region (tunable from 1100 to 1400 nm) upon excitation at 550 nm. Not only is the difficulty of preparing the CdHgTe NC−polymer bulk composites overcome, but also the composites show excellent thermal and luminescent stabilities, which is of importance for their future applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207