MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adventures in the origin of modern operative laparoscopy

2002· article· en· W1979458794 on OpenAlexaff
H. Courtenay Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueGynaecological Endoscopy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLaparoscopySurgeryGeneral surgeryTyingOpen surgeryAdventureLaparoscopic surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Objective Development of instruments and methods for surgery through small incisions, which allowed indigent patients to leave hospital early, in Port of Spain, Trinidad. Methods At the State University of New York at Buffalo, these methods and instruments were combined with laparoscopy to open this era of modern operative laparoscopy. Interventions Frenzy of marketing for the highest profit margin; useless and dangerous technology; ravishing of patents; surgeon adventurers for fame and fortune; clip, cut and burn surgery; complications, and laparoscopic surgery at the point of disrepute. Results Regulation; criteria; cost‐effectiveness; suturing and tying; training; fewer complications; application to most organs and cavities of the body, and acceptance of minimal access surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGynaecological EndoscopySame topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207