MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979459386 · doi:10.1177/109719602765071658

Air Pressure and Building Envelopes

2002· article· en· W1979459386 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Lstiburek, Kim D. Pressnail, J. Timusk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thermal Envelope and Building Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHygrothermal properties of building materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsServiceability (structure)Indoor air qualityAirflowArchitectural engineeringDurabilityEnvironmental scienceUnintended consequencesAir conditioningEngineeringCivil engineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Control of airflow is essential to several important performance aspects of the building system. Air carries moisture which impacts a material’s longterm performance (serviceability) and structural integrity (durability), behavior in fire (smoke spread), indoor air quality (distribution of pollutants and microbial reservoirs) and thermal energy. Typical case studies are presented to illustrate how each of the above characteristics is affected when unintended airflow occurs as a result of poor construction. In some cases, there was simply a lack of understanding of the consequences of ignoring potential leakage paths and the interaction of the mechanical conditioning systems with the building structure. Rehabilitation of a troubled building requires that these interactions be understood. In general, the approach to developing that understanding is not involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thermal Envelope and Building ScienceSame topicHygrothermal properties of building materialsFrench-language works237,207