MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979476514 · doi:10.1117/12.856809

Tunable spatial heterodyne spectroscopy (TSHS): a new technique for broadband visible interferometry

2010· article· en· W1979476514 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sona Hosseini, Aaron Gong, H. A. Baldis, Walter M. Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of WashingtonRyerson UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsOpticsHeterodyne (poetry)InterferometryGratingBeam splitterPhysicsSpectrometerBroadbandDiffraction gratingSpectral resolutionDetectorAstronomical interferometerWavefrontBand-pass filterLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the study of faint, extended sources at high resolving power, interferometry offers significant etendue advantages relative to conventional dispersive grating spectrometers. A Spatial Heterodyne Spectrometer (SHS) is a compact format two-beam interferometer that produces wavenumber dependent 2-D Fizeau fringe pattern from which an input spectrum can be obtained via a Fourier transform. The sampled bandpass of SHS is limited by the highest spatial frequency that can be sampled by the detector, which is typically less than 10 nm. This limitation has made these instruments useful primarily for studies of single emission line features or molecular bands. To date there have been few broadband implementations. We describe here continuing progress toward development of a broadband tunable SHS (TSHS) that is based on an all-reflective format where a single grating operates simultaneously as a beam-splitter, dispersive element, and beam combiner. The narrow spectral coverage of the TSHS is moved to different tuning wavenumbers by adjusting the angle of the pilot mirrors that guide the interfering beams through the optical path, thus slewing the acceptance band over a much broader spectral range. Our present effort involves a breadboard laboratory prototype of a secondgeneration TSHS in which we address several technical limitations of an earlier version. In particular the new design reduces wavefront distortions on the pilot mirrors, solves problems with magnification and focus of the fringe localization plane onto the detector, and addresses the variability in sensitivity and resolving power limitations of using a single grating over a large bandpass.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207