Evolution and extinction of the North American <i>Hiscobeccus</i> brachiopod Fauna during the Late Ordovician
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The earliest rhynchonellid brachiopods were small-shelled and preferred cool-water conditions in both siliciclastic and carbonate environments. Relatively large shells of Rhynchotrema evolved in mid-Caradoc time and rapidly became widespread in Laurentia. Hiscobeccus probably evolved from Rhynchotrema during the late Caradoc by developing a large, globular, strongly lamellose shell. The earliest form of Hiscobeccus shows transitional characteristics between Rhynchotrema and typical Hiscobeccus, most notably in its nonglobular shell that is wrinkled by growth lamellae only on the anterior two thirds of the shell. By early Ashgill time, Hiscobeccus became widespread in North American inland basins, although it remained common in marginal carbonate platforms and basins. During the Ashgill, Hiscobeccus, Lepidocyclus, and Hypsiptycha represented a distinct North American fauna, characterized by large, globular, and completely wrinkled shells. These morphological features were adaptations to the shallow, well-circulated, epicontinental, tropical seas with a soft muddy substrate. The gigantism exhibited by the Hiscobeccus Fauna is also shown by orthid and strophomenid brachiopods, gastropods, nautiloids, and trilobites. Extinction of the Hiscobeccus Fauna was probably related to its narrow range of environmental tolerance, especially during the Gondwana continental glaciation, which brought a major global sea-level drawdown and lowered ocean temperature. The cool-water Rostricellula and Rhynchotrema were uncommon in inland seas during the Ashgill and were represented by several opportunistic species in the Anticosti Basin during the Hirnantian and Llandovery, and most of these preferred siliciclastic-rich or deep-water shelf carbonate environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".