MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979492174 · doi:10.1039/b303355d

Direct multielemental analysis of human serum by ICP-MS with on-line standard addition using flow injection

2003· article· en· W1979492174 on OpenAlexaff
Chao-Yang Huang, Diane Beauchemin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical chemistry methods development
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlow injection analysisAnalyteChemistryChromatographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometryCertified reference materialsDilutionStandard additionStandard solutionMass spectrometrySample preparationSample (material)Detection limit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple method where on-line standard addition is performed using flow injection was applied to the direct analysis of human serum by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The method involves the injection of 50 μL aliquots of sample into two carriers: 1% HNO3 and a standard solution in 1% HNO3 whose analyte concentration is greater than that in the sample. Because flow injection is used, no sample pretreatment (such as sample dilution or the addition of surfactant or internal standard) is needed, which minimizes sample contamination. Seronorm™ reference human serum was analyzed. Results in good agreement with the certified values were obtained for Al, Mn, Fe, Co, Cu and Zn.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical Atomic SpectrometrySame topicAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFrench-language works237,207