MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cutaneous changes in fibrous hamartoma of infancy

2006· article· en· W1979493960 on OpenAlexaff
David Grynspan, K. Meir, C. Senger, Neil J. Ball

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Pathology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSoft tissue tumor case studies
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHamartomaMedicinePathologyLesionBiopsyHyperplasiaHistologyEpidermis (zoology)Duct (anatomy)Anatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Fibrous hamartoma of infancy (FHI) is a fast growing soft tissue tumor that usually arises in the first 2 years of life. The histology of the lesion has been well described. Few studies, however, have looked at changes in the overlying skin and its appendages. METHODS: A database search performed at British Columbia Children's Hospital yielded 15 cases of unequivocal FHI occurring in 12 patients (three were recurrences). Of these, we were able to retrieve 13. Five of 13 cases had sections including epidermis. These slides were reviewed with specific emphasis on skin adnexae. RESULTS: Of the cases with excised epidermis in continuity with the lesion, 5/5 had eccrine changes, including hyperplasia, duct dilatation, intraluminal papillary formations, and squamous syringometaplasia. One case showed epidermal basaloid follicular hyperplasia. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that eccrine changes are frequently seen in cases of FHI when overlying skin is sampled. This may be a useful clue to consider this diagnosis, especially when the biopsy is superficial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous PathologySame topicSoft tissue tumor case studiesFrench-language works237,207