MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979498210 · doi:10.1111/pcmr.12100

Chk1 is essential for the development of murine epidermal melanocytes

2013· article· en· W1979498210 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Joanne Smith, Lionel Larue, David A. Gillespie

Bibliographic record

VenuePigment Cell & Melanoma Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicmelanin and skin pigmentation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Cancer ResearchInstitut National Du CancerBeatson Institute for Cancer ResearchLigue Contre le CancerCancer Research UK
KeywordsMelanocyteBiologyEmbryonic stem cellCell biologyEmbryoGenetically modified mouseTransgeneAlleleMolecular biologyGeneticsMelanomaGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Embryonic deletion of mouse Chk1 is lethal; however, whether Chk1 is essential in all individual tissues is unknown. By breeding C57Bl/ 6 mice homozygous for a conditional allele of Chk1 (Chk1fl/fl) and bearing melanocyte-specific Tyr::Cre and DCT:: LacZ transgenes, we investigated the consequences of Chk1 deletion in the melanocytic lineage. We show that adult Tyr::Cre; Chk1fl/fl mice lack coat pigmentation and epidermal melanocytes in the hair follicles, but retain eye pigmentation in the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE). Melanoblasts formed normally during embryogenesis in Tyr::Cre; Chk1fl/fl mice at early times (embryonic day 10.5; E10.5) but were completely absent by stage E13.5, most probably as a consequence of spontaneous DNA damage and apoptosis. By contrast, melanoblast numbers were only slightly reduced in heterozygous Tyr::Cre; Chk1fl/ + embryos, and these mice exhibited normal coat pigmentation as adults. Thus, Chk1 is essential for the developmental formation of murine epidermal melanocytes but hemizygosity has little, if any, permanent developmental consequence in this cell type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePigment Cell & Melanoma ResearchSame topicmelanin and skin pigmentationFrench-language works237,207