MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979511494 · doi:10.1002/jmri.20744

EEG‐fMRI using z‐shimming in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy

2006· article· en· W1979511494 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew P. Bagshaw, Leili Torab, Eliane Kobayashi, Colin Hawco, François Dubeau, G. Bruce Pike, Jean Gotman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSavoy FoundationEpilepsy Foundation
KeywordsElectroencephalographyEpilepsyEEG-fMRIVoxelSIGNAL (programming language)Functional magnetic resonance imagingTemporal lobeBlood oxygenationBlood-oxygen-level dependentPattern recognition (psychology)Nuclear medicineMedicineComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceNeurosciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To use z-shimming, a technique that reduces signal loss due to susceptibility artifacts that can result in reduced or absent activation in electroencephalography (EEG) functional MRI (fMRI) sessions in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), to determine whether it would result in an increased ability to detect significant regions of blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal change. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients with TL EEG spikes underwent an EEG-fMRI scanning session using z-shimming. The signal intensities in the z-shimmed images were compared with those in the standard images. BOLD activation maps were created from the two sets of images using the timings of the spikes observed on the EEG. RESULTS: The mean signal increase in the TLs as a result of z-shimming was 45.9%+/-4.5%. The percentage of TL voxels above a brain intensity threshold rose from 66.1%+/-7.6% to 77.6%+/-5.7%. This appreciable increase in signal did not lead to any significant differences in the statistical maps created with the two sets of functional images. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that loss of signal is not the limiting factor for the detection of spike-related BOLD signal changes in patients with TLE activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207