On collisionality dependence of the neoclassical tearing modes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of validity of the semi-phenomenological model of collisionality dependence of the polarization current contribution into the generalized Rutherford equation for neoclassical tearing modes proposed by Wilson H R et al(1996 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion38A149) and later discussed and analysed by Maraschek M et al(1999 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion41L1) is considered. It is shown that the collisionality dependence of the polarization current in this model contradicts that in the theory of linear MHD instabilities. Because of this, the above model is, to some extent, ad hoc . Since this model cannot be substantiated by any theory developed up until now, it should be used with care for evaluation of the plasma behaviour in ITER. The discussed disagreement between experiments, for which interpretation of this model was used, and a recent theory of magnetic islands may serve as a stimulus for further development of the theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it