La contestation judiciaire de la politique linguistique du Québec en matière de langue d'enseignement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les origines de l’actuelle politique linguistique quebecoise remontent aux annees 1960. A cette epoque, l’on avait constate certaines realites fort inquietantes pour les Quebecois francophones. D’une part, les immigrants «allophones» (c’est-a-dire qui ne parlaient ni l’anglais ni le francais) envoyaient majoritairement leurs enfants a l’ecole anglaise plutot qu’a l’ecole francaise. Comme le taux de natalite des Quebecois francophones commencait a baisser considerablement a la meme epoque, la situation majoritaire des francophones se serait trouvee menacee a long terme si ces tendances avaient perdure. D’autre part, le francais occupait une position subordonnee a celle de l’anglais dans la vie economique et sociale. A partir de ces constatations, le premier objectif de la politique linguistique sera de ramener les enfants des immigrants a l’ecole francaise; le deuxieme consistera a rehausser le prestige et l’utilite de la langue francaise dans la vie economique et sociale, de facon a inciter les non-francophones a l’utiliser, pour qu’elle devienne la «langue commune» (ou langue de contact) entre la maI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".