MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979572679 · doi:10.2118/163078-pa

A Fully Coupled Multiphase Multicomponent Flow and Geomechanics Model for Enhanced Coalbed-Methane Recovery and CO2 Storage

2013· article· en· W1979572679 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhijie Wei, Dongxiao Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Properties and Utilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsGeomechanicsCoalbed methanePetroleum engineeringMultiphase flowReservoir simulationHydrogeologyEnhanced oil recoveryPorosityPermeability (electromagnetism)Effective stressMaterials scienceGeologyMechanicsGeotechnical engineeringChemistryCoalCoal mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Enhanced coalbed-methane (ECBM) recovery by the injection of CO2 and/or N2 is an attractive method for recovering additional natural gas resources, while at the same time sequestering CO2 in the subsurface. For the naturally fractured coalbed-methane (CBM) reservoirs, the coupled fluid-flow and geomechanics effects involving both the effective-stress effect and the matrix shrinkage/swelling, are crucial to simulate the permeability change and; thus gas migration during primary or enhanced CBM recovery. In this work, a fully coupled multiphase multicomponent flow and geomechanics model is developed. The coupling effects are modeled by introducing a set of elaborate geomechanical equations, which can provide more fundamental understanding about the solid deformation and give a more accurate permeability/porosity prediction over the existing analytical models. In addition, the fluid-flow model in our study is fully compositional; considering both multicomponent gas dissolution and water volatility. To obtain accurate gas solubility in the aqueous phase, the Peng-Robinson equation of state (EOS) is modified according to the suggestions of Søreide and Whitson (1992). An extended Langmuir isotherm is used to describe the adsorption/desorption behavior of the multicomponent gas to/from the coal surface. With a fully implicit finite-difference method, we develop: a 3D, multiphase, multicomponent, dual-porosity CBM/ECBM research code that is fully compositional and has fully coupled fluid flow and geomechanics. It has been partially validated and verified by comparison against other simulators such as GEM, Eclipse, and Coalgas. We then perform a series of simulations/investigations with our research code. First, history matching of Alberta flue-gas-injection micropilot data is performed to test the permeability model. The commonly used uniaxial-strain and constant-overburden-stress assumptions for analytical permeability models are then assessed. Finally, the coupling effects of fluid flow and geomechanics are investigated, and the impact of different mixed CO2/N2 injection scenarios is explored for both methane (CH4) production and CO2 sequestration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE JournalSame topicCoal Properties and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207