Vanadium(V) Complexes of α-Hydroxycarboxylic Acids in Aqueous Solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
51V NMR and IR spectroscopic studies of the complexes formed between vanadate and the alpha-hydroxylic acid ligands, (S)-2-hydroxypropanoic acid (L-(+)-lactic acid), 2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanoic acid, and 2-ethyl-2-hydroxybutanoic acid were carried out for aqueous 1 M ionic strength (NaCl) solutions. Three major products in V to L stoichiometries of 1:1, 2:2, and 3:2 were identified from vanadate and ligand concentration studies, while a pH variation study allowed charge states to be determined. At pH 7.06, the formation constants for the predominant reactions were (26 +/- 1) M (-1), (V + L <= => VL); (6.8 +/- 0.4) x 10(3) M(-1), (2VL <= => V(2)L(2)); and (3.5 +/- 0.3) x 10(3) M(-1), (V(2)L(2) + V <= => V(3)L(2)). Dissolution studies of various crystalline products were carried out for aqueous, nonaqueous, and mixed solvent systems. These studies combined with information available from X-ray structural studies provided a basis for the assignment of solution state structures. Pentacoordinate vanadium in a trigonal-bipyramidal geometry was proposed for the both the 1:1 and 2:2 complexes when in aqueous solution. Observed changes in (51)V chemical shift patterns were consistent with a cis fusion in octahedral coordination for the central vanadium of the 3:2 complex, while the remaining vanadiums retained a pentacoordinate geometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".