MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979641123 · doi:10.1353/can.0.0184

The Spirit of Industry and Improvement: Liberal Government and Rural-Industrial Society, Nova Scotia, 1790–1862 (review)

2009· article· en· W1979641123 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
David Bent

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaPoliticsIdeologyEconomic historyGovernment (linguistics)Industrial RevolutionColonialismPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryEthnologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Spirit of Industry and Improvement: Liberal Government and Rural-Industrial Society, Nova Scotia, 1790–1862 David Bent The Spirit of Industry and Improvement: Liberal Government and Rural-Industrial Society, Nova Scotia, 1790–1862. Daniel Samson. Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2008. Pp. 448, $85.00 cloth, $34.95 paper Daniel Samson once said that history looked different from the countryside, and his new book, The Spirit of Industry and Improvement, does a splendid job of proving this point. In this work Samson takes [End Page 335] the story of the nineteenth-century rise of industrialism and liberalism away from its usual urban settings and places it in the countryside of northern Nova Scotia and Cape Breton Island. This area, Samson shows, was an epicentre of Nova Scotia’s industrial development and one of the key battlegrounds of its political construction. The area’s bounty of natural resources, particularly coal, triggered a confrontation between rural workers and elites over the appropriate means of economic production and resource ownership; the former leaned towards household and communal subsistence, while the latter was enamoured with economic expansion and state building. Samson reveals that the consolidation of modernity and the liberal order was a fragmented process, contested along class and ideological lines, that its outcome was far from certain, and that its primary battlefield in colonial Nova Scotia was the countryside. Nineteenth-century rural Nova Scotia was a society sharply divided along ethnic and class lines. As the century wore on, these tensions were further heightened by a rising ideological conflict between an older communitarian way of life and an emerging capitalist one. On either side of this divide were poorer settlers and middle-class ‘improvers.’ The former lived in communities where a moral economy of mutual aid and sustainability were paramount, while the latter ascribed to the philosophy of political economy, whereby increased personal wealth, economic production and efficiency, and national and imperial strength were the key prerogatives of any economic activity. Although liberal and progressive, improvement ideology retained some ideas of the pre-modern world it was working to displace, such as a belief in an ordered society ruled by an elite class that oversaw the regulation of the lives and labour of those it governed. Samson provides engaging intellectual biographies of two of the key contemporary economic theorists of rural Nova Scotia, John ‘Agricola’ Young and Thomas McCulloch. Young was an enthusiastic proponent of the improvement ideology, arguing that elites could educate and elevate the mass of rural workers with the newest methods of scientific agriculture. McCulloch was more sympathetic to the older, communal way of rural life but was no less an advocate of improvement, believing that attentiveness to one’s familial and Christian duties in agriculture and industry were the best way for personal and societal improvement. The struggle that occurred between these two groups was fought over the rights of coal and other natural resources that abounded in northern Nova Scotia, and the nature of common and private land. Trade in coal began in the earliest days of settlement, carried out by [End Page 336] poor settlers for their own use or for extra cash. The settler left few records, but Samson uses what sources are available to present the reader with a portrait of life and labour of the rural poor. The activities of the state were much better chronicled (hence they bulk large in Samson’s analysis), and its goals were far more ambitious – the control and regulation of Nova Scotia’s rural resources, industry, and economic relations. Thus the state increasingly intervened in formerly self-governing rural communities, often in the form of monopolistic corporations such as the General Mining Association. By enforcing Crown control of natural resources, these efforts were designed to limit their exploitation by traditional harvesters. Rural dwellers were drawn in by wages, and mining towns became industrial colonies in the countryside, but even here there was pronounced rurality, as most families grew crops or raised animals, thus maintaining a degree of their former sustenance. Efforts were also underway to improve agriculture with emerging agricultural societies led by the middle class. These bodies were dedicated to educating farmers...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207