Ca2+ Activation of Smooth Muscle Contraction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smooth muscle contraction is activated by phosphorylation of the 20-kDa light chains of myosin catalyzed by Ca(2+)/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent myosin light chain kinase (MLCK). According to popular current theory, the CaM involved in MLCK regulation is Ca(2+)-free and dissociated from the kinase at resting cytosolic free Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)). An increase in [Ca(2+)](i) saturates the four Ca(2+)-binding sites of CaM, which then binds to and activates actin-bound MLCK. The results of this study indicate that this theory requires revision. Sufficient CaM was retained after skinning (demembranation) of rat tail arterial smooth muscle in the presence of EGTA to support Ca(2+)-evoked contraction, as observed previously with other smooth muscle tissues. This tightly bound CaM was released by the CaM antagonist trifluoperazine (TFP) in the presence of Ca(2+). Following removal of the (Ca(2+))(4)-CaM-TFP(2) complex, Ca(2+) no longer induced contraction. The addition of exogenous CaM to TFP-treated tissue at a [Ca(2+)] subthreshold for contraction or even in the absence of Ca(2+) (presence of 5 mm EGTA), followed by washout of unbound CaM, restored Ca(2+)-induced contraction; this required MLCK activation, since it was blocked by the MLCK inhibitor ML-9. The data suggest, therefore, that a specific pool of cellular CaM, tightly bound to myofilaments at resting [Ca(2+)](i), or even in the absence of Ca(2+), is responsible for activation of contraction following a local increase in [Ca(2+)]. This mechanism would allow for localized changes in [Ca(2+)] in regions of the cell distant from the myofilaments to regulate distinct Ca(2+)-dependent processes without triggering a contractile response. Immobilized CaM, therefore, resembles troponin C, the Ca(2+)-binding regulatory protein of striated muscle, which is also bound to the thin filament in a Ca(2+)-independent manner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".