Molecular phylogeny of four selected species of the strictly anamorphic genus Thysanophora using nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To estimate the phylogenetic position of the strictly anamorphic genus Thysanophora among the class Ascomycetes sensu Kirk et al. and to examine the phylogenetic relationships among T. penicillioides and other Thysanophora species, 18S and 28S rDNA (D1 and D2 regions) sequences of 22 strains of four known and two unidentified Thysanophora species were determined and phylogenetically analyzed. The 18S rDNA analysis suggested that all Thysanophora species examined were members of Eurotiomycetidae, Eurotiales, Trichocomaceae. The 28S rDNA analysis indicated that these species were clustered together with Chromocleista, Eupenicillium, Geosmithia, and Penicillium assignable to three subgenera – Aspergilloides, Furcatum, and Penicillium. In the Eupenicillium lineage, a monophyly of T. penicillioides, T. longispora, T. taxi, T. canadensis, and T. cf. canadensis was supported by comparatively high bootstrap values. However, the ex-type strain and two strains of T. longispora isolated in Japan were of different phylogenetic positions. Thysanophora sp. was positioned at the base of the Thysanophora clade, although it was not supported by significant bootstrap values. From the results of this study, we consider that two anamorphic genera, Penicillium and Thysanophora, are clearly distinct in morphology but that they are not phylogenetically separable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".