MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979681515 · doi:10.1021/ic010678v

Stacking Efficiency of Diselenadiazolyl π-Dimers. Consequences for Electronic Structure and Transport Properties

2001· article· en· W1979681515 on OpenAlexaff
James F. Britten, O.P. Clements, A. W. Cordes, Robert C. Haddon, Richard T. Oakley, John F. Richardson

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOrganic and Molecular Conductors Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDimerMonoclinic crystal systemStackingCrystallographyvan der Waals forceCrystal structureDiamagnetismCrystal (programming language)ConductivityMoleculePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The preparation and crystal structure of 5-cyanofuran-2-[1,2,3,5-diselenadiazolyl], [RCN(2)Se(2)] (R = 5-cyanofuran), is reported. Crystal data for C(6)H(2)ON(3)Se(2): monoclinic, space group P2(1), a = 7.1121(7), b= 20.541(2), c =20.923(2) A, beta = 99.785(1) degrees, Z = 16. The crystal structure consists of diselenadiazolyl pi-dimer stacks running parallel to the x direction; the asymmetric unit consists of four pi-dimer units. The dimers are aligned into snakelike ribbons along the y direction, with consecutive dimers linked by head-to-tail CN-Se contacts. Each pi-dimer stack is bordered by two out-of-register stacks, but most interstack Se-Se contacts lie outside the van der Waals separation. Along the pi-dimer stacks, the intradimer Se-Se distances range from 3.183(10) to 3.294(1) A, and the interdimer Se-Se distances range from 3.826(1) to 3.945(1) A. Like other pi-dimer stacked diselenadiazolyls, [C(6)H(2)ON(3)Se(2)](2) is diamagnetic over the temperature range 4-380K. Variable temperature single-crystal conductivity measurements reveal a room-temperature conductivity near 10(-5) S cm(-1) and provide a calculated band gap of 0.72 eV. The structural results and transport properties are interpreted in the light of Extended Hückel band structure calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicOrganic and Molecular Conductors ResearchFrench-language works237,207