MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979685002 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/20/6/s14

Rapid three-dimensional inversion of multi-transmitter electromagnetic data using the spectral Lanczos decomposition method

2004· article· en· W1979685002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael S. Zhdanov, Alexey Chernyavskiy

Bibliographic record

VenueInverse Problems · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLanczos resamplingInversion (geology)Regularization (linguistics)Inverse problemTransmitterAlgorithmSynthetic dataComputer scienceMathematicsApplied mathematicsGeologyMathematical analysisArtificial intelligencePhysicsSeismologyTelecommunicationsEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a new method of three-dimensional (3D) inversion of multi-transmitter electromagnetic data. We apply the spectral Lanczos decomposition method (SLDM) in the framework of the localized quasi-linear inversion introduced by Zhdanov and Tartaras (2002 Geophys. J. Int . 148 506–19). The SLDM makes it possible to find the regularized solution of the ill-posed inverse problem for all values of the regularization parameter α at once. As an illustration, we apply this technique for interpretation of the helicopter-borne electromagnetic (HEM) data over inhomogeneous geoelectrical structures, typical for mining exploration. This technique helps to accelerate HEM data inversion and provides a stable and focused image of the geoelectrical target. The new method and the corresponding computer code have been tested on synthetic data. The case history includes interpretation of HEM data collected by INCO Exploration in the Voisey's Bay area of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInverse ProblemsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207