Prediction of Onset of Corrosion in Concrete Bridge Decks Using Neural Networks and Case-Based Reasoning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This article proposes a methodology for predicting the time to onset of corrosion of reinforcing steel in concrete bridge decks while incorporating parameter uncertainty. It is based on the integration of artificial neural network (ANN), case-based reasoning (CBR), mechanistic model, and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). A probabilistic mechanistic model is used to generate the distribution of the time to corrosion initiation based on statistical models of the governing parameters obtained from field data. The proposed ANN and CBR models act as universal functional mapping tools to approximate the relationship between the input and output of the mechanistic model. These tools are integrated with the MCS technique to generate the distribution of the corrosion initiation time using the distributions of the governing parameters. The proposed methodology is applied to predict the time to corrosion initiation of the top reinforcing steel in the concrete deck of the Dickson Bridge in Montreal. This study demonstrates the feasibility, adequate reliability, and computational efficiency of the proposed integrated ANN-MCS and CBR-MCS approaches for preliminary project-level and also network-level analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".