MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979707773 · doi:10.1021/ma902735t

SCFT Study of Tiling Patterns in ABC Star Terpolymers

2010· article· en· W1979707773 on OpenAlexaff
Guojie Zhang, Feng Qiu, Hongdong Zhang, Yuliang Yang, An‐Chang Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStar (game theory)CopolymerPhase diagramReciprocalPhase (matter)Monte Carlo methodReciprocal latticeField (mathematics)Materials scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Statistical physicsPhysicsPolymerCombinatoricsMathematicsPure mathematicsQuantum mechanicsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ordered phases of ABC star terpolymer melts are investigated using a generic reciprocal-space implementation of the self-consistent field theory (SCFT) of polymers. The most important feature of ABC star triblock terpolymers is that their three blocks are joined at one junction point. This distinct topology of ABC star terpolymers constraints the junction points in one-dimensional lines in an ordered phase, resulting novel microphase-separated morphologies such as tiling patterns. Two types of star triblock terpolymers, with symmetric and asymmetric interaction parameters, are studied in detail. A variety of tiling patterns in ABC star terpolymers have been predicted from the SCFT calculation and relevant phase diagrams have been constructed. The predicted phase transition sequences from the SCFT calculations are in qualitative agreement with experimental and Monte Carlo simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicBlock Copolymer Self-AssemblyFrench-language works237,207