Vector Perturbation Precoding for Network MIMO: Sum Rate, Fair User Scheduling, and Impact of Backhaul Delay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to study the performance of a multicell vector perturbation (MVP) precoding technique under practical situations in a network multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) scheme employing joint transmission. The conventional perturbation strategy that minimizes the total power is considered, and the power at each base station (BS) is properly scaled to enforce per-BS power constraints. In our scenario, we consider multiple-antenna users and use block diagonalization (BD) as the linear front-end precoder for VP. The sum rate for the MVP in the case of uniformly distributed input and an asymptotic upper bound on the sum rate at high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) are derived. In addition, using the asymptotic upper bound on the individual user rates, we propose a proportionally fair (PF) user scheduling algorithm of lower complexity and better performance compared with the benchmark fair semiorthogonal user selection (SUS) algorithm. As opposed to the PF-SUS, the proposed PF scheduling algorithm requires no predefined correlation threshold. Furthermore, we study the impact of backhaul delay on the performance of both VP and BD by deriving bounds on the sum rate. The numerical results show that MVP in the case of perfect channel state information (CSI) outperforms multicell BD. In the presence of a backhaul delay, the performance of MVP significantly degrades, but the upper bound on the sum rate for MVP is still higher than for multicell BD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".