MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979785566 · doi:10.1097/ogx.0b013e318235215c

Major Risk Factors for Stillbirth in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2011· review· en· W1979785566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOverweightCINAHLPopulationEnvironmental healthObesityBody mass indexRisk factorHigh income countriesDemographyDeveloping countryPsychological interventionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Risk factors for stillbirth have been extensively investigated in the past 2 decades, with increasing emphasis on those that are potentially avoidable. Use of strategies that target potentially avoidable or preventable risk factors could achieve reduction in stillbirth rates. This systematic review of the medical literature was conducted to identify important risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries that could be potentially reduced through lifestyle or medical intervention. Data from population-based studies published between 1998 and 2009 were obtained by search of several databases, including Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews. The contribution of important modifiable risk factors for stillbirth was estimated for the 5 high-income countries (Australia, Canada, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and United States) having the highest numbers of stillbirths and all relevant data required for analysis. The population-attributable risk (PAR) was calculated for each risk factor identified. Among the 6963 studies identified in the initial review, 96 population-based studies were included after full review. Across the 5 countries, the highest ranking modifiable risk factors were maternal overweight and obesity (body mass index >25 kg/m2); prevalence of overweight and obesity ranged from 28% to 58%, with PARs of around 8% to 18% contributing to around 8000 stillbirths (≥22 weeks' gestation) annually. Two other important modifiable risk factors, advanced maternal age (>35 years) and maternal smoking, had PARs of 7% to 11% and 4% to 7%, respectively, and contribute annually to more than 4200 and 2800 stillbirths, respectively. Maternal smoking is estimated to contribute to approximately 20% of stillbirths in disadvantaged populations (indigenous Australian and Canadian women). The contribution of primiparity to stillbirths is estimated to be around 15%. Among pregnancy disorders, small size for gestational age and placental abruption have the highest PARs (23% and 15%, respectively). Other important risk factors associated with stillbirth in high-income countries include preexisting diabetes and hypertension. These findings suggest that a prevention strategy addressing potentially modifiable risk factors for stillbirth (overweight and obesity, advanced maternal age, and smoking) in high-income countries may achieve substantial reductions in stillbirth rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it