MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Postoperative Pain And Medication Use: Single Versus Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament (acl) Reconstruction

2009· article· en· W1979787297 on OpenAlexaff
Brad Monteleone, Mark Heard, Laurie A. Hiemstra, Treny M. Sasyniuk

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsBanff Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionAnterior cruciate ligamentRandomized controlled trialSurgeryHamstring

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Several studies have compared clinical outcomes for double and single bundle ACL reconstructions. However, little is known about immediate post-operative outcomes such as patient pain and medication use. The purpose was to obtain preliminary data on pain levels and medication use during the first 14 days post-operative between patients having a single versus double bundle hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Two groups: (1) Single-bundle(S) - patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial investigating post-operative immobilization following single-bundle ACL reconstruction and (2) Double-bundle(D) - a consecutive series of patients receiving a double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Visual analog scores (VAS) were recorded (0mm = no pain to 100mm = worst pain) at: 8am and 8pm for the first two days and 5pm for days 3-14 postoperative. Patients also recorded the type of medication consumed and time of consumption. Patients in both groups were not braced post-operatively. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (19 male, 12 female) with a mean (SD) age of 29.2 (5.9) years underwent single bundle reconstruction and 17 patients (10 males, 7 female) with a mean (SD) age of 24.3 (8.8) years had a double bundle reconstruction. Pain scores were lower for the single bundle group at all intervals during the first 14 days post-operative except the evening of surgery, Day 9 and Day 11 (Mean (SD): S=31.4 (21.1); 26.4 (20.9); 21.9 (18.9), respectively and D=30.4 (23.3); 21.3 (19.3); 20.7 (15.2), respectively). The greatest mean difference in pain scores between groups were seen on Day 1am (mean difference=12.4; p=0.050, 95% CI -0.023, 24.9) and on Day 2am (mean difference=12.6; p=0.076, 95% CI -1.39, 26.8). Regardless of procedure, the greatest pain was Day 1pm (mean (SD): S=50.9 (21.2) and D=53.4 (20.1); mean difference=2.5; p=0.701, 95% CI -10.2, 15.1). With respect to medication use: oral and injectable opioids, NSAIDs, and acetaminophen consumption were similar between the two groups at all intervals. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggested that patients who had double bundle ACL reconstruction had higher pain levels during the first 14 days post-operative than patients who had single bundle ACL reconstruction. Despite the higher pain levels, medication consumption was similar between the two groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques→French-language works237,207→